safe staffing
After two decades of fighting for statewide Safe minimum staffing standards to reduce nurse burnout and turnover, encourage more RNs to return to the bedside, and improve patient safety in Pennsylvania, our legislation — the patient safety act — passed the house!
For the first time since its introduction in the PA General Assembly more than 20 years ago, safe staffing legislation — the Patient Safety Act (House Bill 106) — received a full vote on the Floor of the House on June 28th, 2023, and it passed overwhelmingly with bipartisan support! the count was 119 to 84.
Our legislative allies on both sides of the aisle — all of them champions of patients and frontline caregivers across the commonwealth — resisted an intense pressure campaign from the influental and well-funded Hospital Association of Pennsylvania (HAP) to defeat the Patient Safety Act and all it promises for patients and caregivers in every hospital in Pennsylvania.
We won! More importantly, our patients won! We are one giant step closer to having minimum safe staffing standards in Pennsylvania!
the patient safety act
There’s an acute nurse staffing crisis in hospitals across the commonwealth, and it wasn’t created by the pandemic. It started long before COVID-19 even existed. Hospitals have too often tried to cut costs by overloading nurses and skimping on patient care. We can’t count on the hospitals, who are the cause of the problem, to fix it. We need PA state legislators to act.
In 1999, California passed, and in 2004, implemented, the first and still only comprehensive state legislation to limit the number of patients that hospital nurses are permitted to care for at one time. The law has been enormously beneficial for patients and, despite what administrators would have us believe, has not led to any issues in their booming healthcare industry. Pennsylvania’s Patient Safety Act (PA House Bill 106 and Senate Bill 240) is patterned after California’s law. Each bill seeks to limit the number of patients a nurse can be assigned depending on the level of care a patient requires. The standards in the bills are very specific and based on patient acuity. For instance, the nurse-to-patient safe minimum standard set forth in the bills for the ICU is 1:2 or fewer; the standard for presurgical and admissions units or ambulatory surgical units is 1:4 or fewer.
PLUS: Safe Harbor Provisions. Both Pennsylvania bills include protections for nurses from “adverse action by the healthcare facility where the nurse is working when the nurse makes a good-faith requrest to reject an assignment based on the nurses’s own education, knowledge, competence and experience, and an immediate assessment of the risk for patient safety.”
On June 28th, 2023, more than 20 years after the bill was initially introduced, the House passed the Patient Safety Act with no amendments not approved by the bill’s prime cosponsors. It now moves to the Pennsylvania Senate.
SOON, we will post a petition urging Pa state senators to address the staffing crisis in our hospitals and act on the house-approved patient safety act! please sign when the link is active.
for more info on the patient safety act and what’s in the bill, click here.
The research
Nurses across the nation have been sounding the alarm for decades: There are simply not enough nurses at the bedside. What this means in ERs and on hospital floors across the commonwealth is that nurses are being asked to care for more patients than is safe for either the patient or the nurse. When nurses are routinely required to care for patients than is safe, it’s called chronic nurse short-staffing, and it’s a crisis for both patients and nurses. Numerous studies over many decades have shown:
Safely staffed hospitals have lower mortality rates.
For every patient added over 4 per nurse, the risk of a surgical patient dying increases by 13%.
According to a 2015 report by the nonpartisan research arm of the PA General Assembly, the nurse staffing levels across Pennsylvania are highly variable and [that variability] has persisted over the last 14 years. Also: “Patients exposed to even short durations of understaffing [such as from shift to shift] were at much higher risk of poor outcomes, including mortality.”
If Pennsylvania had matched California’s 1:5 ratios in surgical units, PA hospitals would have 11% fewer deaths. That would mean 264 fewer surgical deaths each year.
for more research on the hospital staffing crisis in Pennsylvania, click here.
safe staffing standards: myths and misconceptions
The staffing crisis in Pennsylvania hospitals is not new, and the cause is not a shortage of available RNs. In truth, our current staffing crisis is the culmination of a decades-old strategy of intentional nurse understaffing by some hospital administrators in an ultimately misguided and counterproductive effort to reduce overall costs. Short nurse staffing doesn’t reduce overall hospital costs. Likewise, safe RN staffing doesn’t increase them. That’s a myth — just one of many surrounding safe staffing standards.
MYTH: Safe nurse staffing standards would cost hospitals too much money.
FACT: Minimum staffing standards will actually save hospitals money. Sure, some hospitals would need to hire additional RNs to meet the minimum standard, but the increased costs of the additional staff would be more than offset by the money saved by the reduction in negative patient outcomes, including missed care, hospital-acquired infections, hospital readmissions, medical errors, wrong-site surgeries, failure to rescure, and death, that would result from proper staffing. In fact, a recent study on the implementation of staffing standards in Queensland, Australia, found that cost savings arising from reduced lengths of stay for patients and fewer readmissions were estimated to be more than twice the costs of additional staffing.
Plus: Negative patient outcomes due to short staffing aren’t the only monetary cost incurred by hospitals. As short-staffing leads to nurse burnout and more nurses leaving the bedside, hospitals have to hire, train, and support new RNs, which is much more costly than simply retaining nurses. In fact, the cost of replacing a single nurse can run up to $80,000.
MYTH: Government interference in the healthcare sector is never the answer. Administrators know best.
FACT: A persistent safety problem in our hospitals is absolutely the state’s concern. The 2015 report by the nonpartisan research arm of the Pennsylvania General Assembly that found that “the nurse staffing levels across Pennsylvania are highly variable and [that variability]has persisted over the last 14 years” also found that “patients exposed to even short durations of understaffing [such as from shift to shift] were at much higher risk of poor outcomes, including mortality.” That means every Pennsylvanian is at risk when unsafe staffing levels are allowed to persist in the commonwealth.
Putting in place minimum safety standards is something the government does all the time in all industries, including hospitals. Minimum staffing standards exist in nursing homes, childcare, and drug and alcohol treatment facilities. Nurse staffing in critical care is simply a blind spot.